Fix MISRA issues for ThreadX SMP (#263)

* Fixed MISRA2012 rule 10.4_a

The operands `pool_ptr->tx_byte_pool_fragments' and `2' have essential type categories unsigned 32-bit int and signed 8-bit int, which do not match.

* Fixed MISRA2012 rule 10.4_a

The operands `next_priority' and `TX_MAX_PRIORITIES' have essential type categories unsigned 32-bit int and signed 8-bit int, which do not match.

* Fixed MISRA2012 rule 8.3

Declaration/definition of `_tx_thread_smp_preemptable_threads_get' is inconsistent with previous declaration/definition in types and/or type qualifiers
This commit is contained in:
TiejunZhou
2023-05-18 15:57:53 +08:00
committed by GitHub
parent 6b8ece0ff2
commit d66a519685
4 changed files with 14 additions and 8 deletions

View File

@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
/* FUNCTION RELEASE */
/* */
/* _tx_thread_system_suspend PORTABLE SMP */
/* 6.1.11 */
/* 6.x */
/* AUTHOR */
/* */
/* William E. Lamie, Microsoft Corporation */
@@ -91,6 +91,8 @@
/* 04-25-2022 Scott Larson Modified comments and fixed */
/* loop to find next thread, */
/* resulting in version 6.1.11 */
/* xx-xx-xxxx Tiejun Zhou Fixed MISRA2012 rule 10.4_a, */
/* resulting in version 6.x */
/* */
/**************************************************************************/
VOID _tx_thread_system_suspend(TX_THREAD *thread_ptr)
@@ -671,7 +673,7 @@ UINT processing_complete;
complex_path_possible = possible_cores & available_cores;
/* Check if we need to loop to find the next highest priority thread. */
if (next_priority == TX_MAX_PRIORITIES)
if (next_priority == (ULONG)TX_MAX_PRIORITIES)
{
loop_finished = TX_TRUE;
}